What do you think about this? Discussion?

September 302009

The question:

Should the news media strive to be objective and
independent of partisan politics? Is this possible?

The answer:

" Will you trust your television? What you get is what you got. When they own the information they can bend it all they want." (John Mayer)

I think it is possible to be unbiased, but so very difficult. It really is hard just to state the facts. Even when we don’t mean to our opinions show through our words and actions. We should be able to hear and see coverage equal to all sides. Then there is the issue of being "politicaly correct". Impossible, there will always be someone who gets offended. A great saying, "You can make some happy some of the time, but you can’t make all happy all of the time" (or something like that). No matter what view point they are coming from someone will complain of thier biases. Being unbiased is something that they should strive for. It gets so confusing sometimes. I was talking to someone the other day about how the presidential campaign is the greatest "reality t.v show". It is so back stabbing and cut throat. It’s great if you love the drama, but if you are looking for good old fashion honest info on things that matter don’t turn on your T.V.

they SHOULD be totally impartial…but they AREN’T…they are ruled by liberal editors and bureau chiefs who have drank the Obama Kool-Aid and see nothing but the rosy glow of Socialism…I dont like the slant of your essay but thats just my view..it is well written…

Why do we limit ourselves to a political oligopoly (rep & dem)?

September 282009

A few independents get through, but there’s never coverage of other national, regional or other real viable political parties if only poeple would educate themselves and participate.

(thanks again ‘dizneyland fan’ for the the link)
http://www.politics1.com/parties.htm

Rep & Dem are the popular and most people vote for them. If they put out a lot of the smaller parties, the Rep & Dem will lose out of votes…. there for the news coverage (controled ny reps & dems) don’t show them a lot.

One my voters card, it says "inderpendant" I vote for the views I agree most with.

Why does the media ignore crimes committed by Christians, of fail to mention religion when Christians kill?

September 282009

Proof of this, have any of you ever heard of the (2001)Walisongo Massacre in Indonesia, i doubt it. Basically some Christians went to a town, raped women and killed men. They then went to an Islamic boarding school and petrol bombed it, killing 100 muslim children. This received no media coverage, yet 3 years later, 3 christian girls were beheaded and it was front page news, Walisongo was still not mentioned even thou a note left by the beheaders mentioned it. Instead the Media covered the "100 more heads" as something independent of anything. Even crimes reported by the media only associate religions when the person has a muslim name, when christians commit crimes religion is never mentioned, even if their crimes discriminate on religion. Why is this Hypocrisy so prevailent in todays society

When does it occur, Their faith is not mentioned. It’s the bias from the media.

Ones ethnicity/faith is only an issue in a crime IF the person is from a minority. OR after it’s in court – & that doesn’t "sell papers"

.

Why are we so polarized about the Health Care debate?

September 282009

since republicans, democrats, independents all can be dropped from their coverage for pre-existing conditions? Since all can be denied based on health status?

Why is there a debate since the health insurance companies screw people regardless of party?

Republican efforts to defeat health care reform really are rooted in the fear — famously articulated in Bill Kristol’s 1993 memo, and reiterated since — that the realization of reform could banish the GOP to the minority for a generation, by cementing the Democrats as the party that’s resurrected the notion that government can improve the lives of the middle class. This is shown in Republican senators that will vote against health care reform without even reading the details.

What U.S. Political Party should I join?

September 282009

My plan is to run for the U.S. House of Represenatives when I’m 25, serve 3 terms (or 2 1/2), run for U.S. Senate when I’m 30/31, and then President of the United States when I’m 35. (I know, I’m ambitious.)

But when it comes to political views, I tend to side with the Democrats too often to be a Republican, but tend to side with the Republicans too often to be a Democrat. I dont’ want to be independent, I perfer running in a party. (I’m also Catholic, yet I always seperate church and state.) These are some of my views:

Abortion: I believe abortion is a woman’s right to hold; if she wants or needs to get an abortion, she should be allowed. Teenage mothers should also be included in this; age can hurt the mother just as much as it can hurt the baby, and all options need to be open in order to protect as many lives as possible.

Education: Support early childhood education, college tuition, and reward better teachers. Also I think everyone should have a chance at a great education. I believe in lowering college tuition, as too many familys are killing themselves trying to payback loans.

Energy: I believe in making sure we replace our dependence on oil with clean coal, solar, wind, bio fuel, water, and other forms of energy that can be renewed.

Free Trade: I support free trade, yet I also believe that Americans should buy many american made products. It will help our economy and increase jobs and revenue.

Gun Control: I take what is has been called the ‘Texan’ gun stance in politics in the sense that as long as a person isnt dangerous, they should continue to have the right to bear arms. (Felons, psychopaths, people with severe depression, etc, will need medical clearance or simply will no longer have this right.

Heath Care: I support Teddy Kennedy’s (God Bless You Ted) views on Health Care in the sense that every American should have cheap, affordable health care that provides good coverage. I mean, Canada gets free health care, and the get 6 free massages covered by it per year!

Homeland Security: How the Patriot Act ever passed is absolutly mindblowing to me, as it pretty much violates everything the Constitution protects…But I do believe in tight Homeland Security, in order to prevent another 9/11 as long as there are prominent threats to the well-being of America.

LGBT Rights: I believe people should follow whatever orientation they
desire, and should have equal rights as every hetero-sexual citizen.

Social Secruity: I believe that some social secruity should be private so that people can choose what they want to invest in. To be honest, I dont know much about it, but people should definetly be able to protect themselves.

Stem cell research: I support stem cell research.

Taxes: Have and even tax rate for all classes. We need to close the gap between the rich and the poor.

Foreign Policy: Have friendly relations with all countries, and to not interfere with their politcal freedoms and beliefs.

go libertarian. peoples rights are always first.

Glasgow is the most deprived city in the UK, has the highest murder rate, yet the government dont give a toss?

September 272009

all they go on about is London, Manchesdter Birmingham etc…… why is this?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/1825869.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/2804895.stm
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/glasgow-is-britains-murder-capital-as-knife-crime-spirals-737329.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2004/apr/11/ukcrime.lornamartin

even for youth where we are FOREVER hearing about London and its ‘problems’ Glasgow is worse,
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/2008/10/27/glasgow-is-britain-s-murder-capital-claims-new-survey-86908-20843315/

they constantly make these documentaries about how rough and hard living in London estates is but Glasgow has a murderr rate 4 times higher. hmmmmmm

why is a murder in london national news worthy yet 3 in Glasgow are not?

why does the media give Glasgow no national coverage
we have our own "government" but Westminister still controls what goes on and what gets spent so dont give me that crap.
the sonner we get inependence from these inbred, self absorbed english twats the better

Crime, social policy, education and healthcare are all devolved issues, meaning your complaints should be addressed to the Scottish Government and not the UK Government.

to all parties, dem and repub, do u like ron paul why or why not?

September 272009

im an independent voter but if ron paul had the coverage that obama and mccain had it would have been a close election. to me ron was the, and still is, a very strong spoken man.

I know its become somewhat popular to just vote for the independent because it shows that you don’t necessarily agree with the democrats or republicans, however Ron Paul was not in my opinion the best candidate of the three. (Obama, McCain, or Paul)

However, Ron Paul is very intelligent, and I don’t believe he would have made a bad president, and if people honestly believe the Republican party is in shambles then I would say if they were more like a Ron Paul republican the party would be saved…

Just remember this is politics, and you are talking about politicians. Its not always the best candidate that wins. Its just the most popular. Just like the most popular celebrities are not necessarily the ones with the most talent.

Can someone check my answers(multiple choice) for a political science class?

September 252009

Thanks for the help.

1. Which is true concerning John Locke�s ideas about government:
a. They suggest they we would be better off if we lived in the �state of nature�.
b. They form the basis of what is known as �classical liberalism�.
c. They were considered completely wrong by Thomas Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence.
d. They emphasize that governments should provide basic services for the poor.

2. Aristotle�s notion of political freedom suggests that:
a. Humans were not meant to be free.
b. Freedom means having to take action and participate in self-rule
c. As long as the government leaders don�t do things you oppose, you are free.
d. Having a voice in the decision making process is less important than being free from

4. American tolerance for economic inequality in the United States is fostered most directly by the belief in:
a.. individualism and social mobility. b. a strong national government.
c. democracy and federalism. d. redistributive public policies

5. Which of the following is true of the relationship between political and economic systems:
a. Command economies such as communism are usually democratic.
b. Capitalism is always associated with democracy.
c. Socialist countries can be democratic.
d. The U.S. is based on laissez faire economy and direct democracy

6. A person who wanted to measure the degree of substantive democracy in a country would most likely examine ____________.
a. whom the policies of the government serve
b. the frequency of elections
c. checks and balances
d. the number political parties

7. Compared to a pure direct democracy, a republic ____________.
a. gives less power to the majority
b. relies less on electing government policy makers
c. rejects the concept of that some people are more capable of others
d. must be smaller in size

8. Which is considered a basic principle of western liberal democracy:
a. majority rule
b. minority rights
c. freedom of speech
d. right to organize in opposition to the government
e. all of the above

9. Which best describes major American media:
a. ownership tends to be more politically liberal than the journalists
b. it is mostly owned by small independent companies
c. news coverage tends to steer towards the middle
d. ownership is becoming more diverse

40. Which is true of the ideological spectrum:
a. historically liberals associated authority more with God and scripture while conservatives emphasized secularism and human reason
b. liberals tend to emphasize economic equality while conservatives emphasize economic freedom
c. it is not possible to be socially liberal but economically conservative
d. all of the above

41. A difference between 19th century classical liberalism and modern liberalism is that:
a. today�s liberals want a smaller role for government than did 19th century liberals
b. today�s liberals see change as inherently bad
c. today�s liberals are more likely to support the regulation of big business
d. today�s liberals are associated with the �right wing�

45. The "watchdog" role of the media is one in which the press should
a. help the president achieve his policy agenda.
b. uncover as much information as possible about the private lives of candidates for public office.
c. dig up facts and warn the public when officials are doing something wrong.
d. take sides on controversial issues.

46. How does corporate ownership of the media influence the type of news gathered?
a. it encourages the network news shows to have a decidedly conservative bias
b. it keeps reporters attuned to sensational sources, rather than those
that are most important
c. it encourages reporters to provide detailed stories that emphasizes facts over images
d. it makes journalists fearful of covering scandals.

47. Which best describes major American media:
a. ownership tends to be more politically liberal than the journalists
b. it is mostly owned by small independent companies
c. news coverage tends to steer towards the middle
d. ownership is becoming more diverse

1. A
2. B
4. A
5. C+D
6 A+C
7. B
8. E
9. B
40.C
41.B
45.C
46.A
47.C

Thank you for posting your answers to these questions. I am much more likely to help someone if they show that they tried to answer the question, even if they’re on the wrong track, than if they just demand that someone answer for them. You’re on the right track with some of these, but you need to look at a few again.

The first questions deals with the views of John Locke. You said the correct answer is that “they suggest they we would be better off if we lived in the ‘state of nature’.” Not true. Locke is sympathetic to a natural state, because he believed in natural law, a principle that governs our actions. Locke saw, though, would make choices that benefited them, even if it violated the principles of natural law. This would lead to the state of war. So, Locke decided that a system of government had to be developed to guarantee life, liberty, and property rights (Jefferson changed the last to “pursuit of happiness” in the Declaration of Independence). This is a positive view of government: it is not a force to suppress natural law and the rights of individuals, but to guarantee that an individual’s rights, and those of his neighbor, are upheld. Locke did not talk about social welfare; he saw the role of government as guaranteeing rights by creating a system wherein contracts and agreements are enforced. What he created was the basis of classic liberalism, with an emphasis on natural rights, which is answer B.

For question 5, you picked C and D as being correct. Answer D says, “The U.S. is based on laissez faire economy and direct democracy.” This is not true. The US is a representative democracy, not a direct one: we elect officials to make governing decisions, rather than voting on them ourselves. The US is also not a laissez faire economy: our government does regulate business (although, perhaps, not as well as it should). Laissez faire means, roughly, “hands-off”, and the US government has not been hand-off when it comes to the economy since early in the twentieth century, when the first President Roosevelt began breaking up monopolies. Answer C, “Socialist countries can be democratic,” is true. To one extent or another, most democracies in Western Europe are socialist, with partial state ownership of some industries, and extensive social welfare policies (health care, pensions, etc.) to protect the citizens against economic failure.

Question 6, “A person who wanted to measure the degree of substantive democracy in a country would most likely examine…” is a bad question. A really good answer (“the transparency of its electoral system”) does not make the list. Of the choices given, A is a good choice, but C is probably a better one. If checks and balances function properly, then a government will be generally responsive to the needs of its citizens, and its policies will reflect that.

Question 7 asks, “Compared to a pure direct democracy, a republic…?” You picked B, “relies less on electing government policy makers.” Not true. In a direct democracy, the people – all of the people who can vote – make the decisions directly. In a representative system, like a republic, the decisions are made by elected officials; the people choose the officials, and they carry out the will of the people in making specific decisions. Democratic republics feature structures that balance power among several different forces (legislatures and courts, for example), typically with systems of law that specifically limit a government’s power. In a direct democracy, the will of the majority can make decisions over-riding the rights of the minority. Incidentally, a republic is a democracy, even if your teacher tells you differently. A direct democracy, as I said, is a system where everyone makes decisions, but that is only one type of democracy (and it’s not used by any country in the world). A democracy is a government that is freely chosen by the people, elected to office, and governing within the rule of law (which means that the government can’t exceed the limits of its own power). A republic is one type of democracy (as in the USA and Germany), a constitutional monarchy (like in Britain or Spain) is another type.

Question 9 asks, “Which best describes major American media?” You chose B, “it is mostly owned by small independent companies.” Not true. ABC is owned by Walt Disney. Rupert Murdoch, a very wealthy conservative, owns Fox, the “Washington Times,” the “Wall Street Journal,” and a string of other assets. The major media are owned by large conglomerate corporations, and more and more media outlets are controlled by fewer companies (which makes answer D invalid). The best answer here is C, “news coverage tends to steer towards the middle.” This is true. The media has its darlings, and paints them in a better light, but generally, the media, taken as a whole, TENDS to strive for balance. This is the case even when one side, left or right, says something untrue; reporters are extremely hesitant to say, “C

Why don’t people realize the media has a conservative bias?

September 252009

The cumulative effect of these false statements — amplified by thousands of news stories and broadcasts — was massive, with the media coverage creating an almost impenetrable din for several critical months in the run-up to war. Some journalists — indeed, even some entire news organizations — have since acknowledged that their coverage during those prewar months was far too deferential and uncritical. These mea culpas notwithstanding, much of the wall-to-wall media coverage provided additional, "independent" validation of the Bush administration’s false statements about Iraq

http://www.publicintegrity.org/WarCard/Default.aspx?src=home&context=overview&id=945
I will admit I don’t have great hopes for convincing NRO readers to see the error of their ways. After all, this is only 500 words. You people are too smart to change your minds about a bedrock belief over just 500 words. For that to happen, I’m afraid, you’d have to buy the book. Do it HERE, if only to give your blood pressure a shot in the arm.

But of course we all know that quite a few of you are too smart to believe that silly nonsense about the media being "liberal." I’m here on this site to tell you guys the jig is up. It’s time to come clean. You’ve milked this cow long enough and she done died. Here’s how I put it in the book: (And for you Goldberg/Coulter fans, those little numbers are called "footnotes." They allow other people to check your work.)

While some conservatives actually believe their own grumbles, the really smart ones don’t. They know mau-mauing the other side is a just a good way to get their ideas across — or perhaps prevent the other side from getting a fair
.. getting a fair hearing for theirs. On occasion, honest conservatives admit this. Rich Bond, then the chair of the Republican Party complained during the 1992 election, "I think we know who the media want to win this election — and I don’t think it’s George Bush.1 The very same Rich Bond also noted during the very same election, however, "There is some strategy to it [bashing the 'liberal' media]. . . . If you watch any great coach, what they try to do is ‘work the refs.’ Maybe the ref will cut you a little slack on the next one."2 Bond is hardly alone. That the so-called liberal media [hereafter "SCLM"], were biased against the administration of Ronald Reagan is an article of faith among Republicans. Yet James Baker, perhaps the most media savvy of them, owned up to the fact that any such complaint was decidedly misplaced. "There were days and times and events we might have had some complaints [but] on balance I don’t think we had anything to complain about,"
anything to complain about," he explained to one writer."3 Patrick Buchanan, among the most conservative pundits and presidential candidates in Republican history, found that he could not identify any allegedly liberal bias against him during his presidential candidacies. "I’ve gotten balanced coverage, and broad coverage — all we could have asked. For heaven sakes, we kid about the ‘liberal media,’ but every Republican on earth does that,"4 the aspiring American ayatollah cheerfully confessed during the 1996 campaign. And even William Kristol, without a doubt the most influential Republican/neoconservative publicist in America today has come clean on this issue. "I admit it," he told a reporter. "The liberal media were never that powerful, and the whole thing was often used as an excuse by conservatives for conservative failures."5 Nevertheless Kristol apparently feels no compunction about exploiting and reinforcing ignorant prejudices of his own constituency. In a 2001 subscription
pitch to conservative potential subscribers of his Rupert Murdoch-funded magazine, Kristol complained, "The trouble with politics and political coverage today is that there’s too much liberal bias…. There’s too much tilt toward the left-wing agenda. Too much apology for liberal policy failures. Too much pandering to liberal candidates and causes."6 (It’s a wonder he left out "Too much hypocrisy.")

http://v2.mediatransparency.org/

http://mediamatters.org/items/200604040001

http://www.cosmoetica.com/B77-DES39.htm

http://www.gargaro.com/abortion/60minutes.html
The greatest evidence of media conservative bias is the continued belief by so many in America about the Bush lies about Iraq, Afghanistan, torture, the economy, etc.

To find out the truth behind the lies one must search for the truth all over. And I’m not talking about Marxist rags please. I don’t deal with marxist rhetoric. They are not to be trusted.

One must search for liberal press that is not to afraid to point out the facts and to do unbiased research. It seems only liberals can speak with little bias unlike the conservative press that continues to vocalize and promote lies and deceits by our present government and past governments. Our present government is running over all the precepts and concepts promoted by our constitutions and the laws of the land. This government will leave an abysmal history unless dealt with strongly, now.

The press must be more honest in order to save this country from the conservative cancer growing inside.
Old Scout — you seem a McCarthyist at heart. No not Jenny!!

you have got to be kidding me!!! I literally just wrote a 10 page research paper on the issue of media bias.

Multiple studies by Harvard, UCLA, UCONN, and many more universities say it is a fact, not a theory, a fact that the media is left-wing biased.

For example, in 2004 journalists were surveyed on the subject of the Bush vs. Kerry election. 52% said they favored Kerry, 19% favored Bush, and 21% declind answer.

In 1976, the Democratic nominee, Jimmy Carter, captured the 81 percent of the reporters surveyed while a mere 19 percent cast their ballots for President Gerald Ford.

In 1972, when 62 percent of the electorate chose President Richard Nixon, 81 percent of the media elite voted for liberal Democratic Senator George McGovern.

Over the 16-year period, the Republican candidate always received less than 20 percent of the media elite’s vote.

Liberal talk radio’s stories on Rudy Giuliani (R-N.Y.), Mr. McCain and Mitt Romney (R- Mass.) were 100 percent negative, while those on Sen. Obama and John Edwards (D-N.C.) were 100 percent positive…….

….while…..

……..Obama actually got more positive coverage than Mr. Giuliani, the Republican (27.8 percent vs. 25 percent) on conservative talk radio.

I could go on forever with this stuff. I hope you realize that the media does not have a conservative bias, but a liberal one.

What should I do in between insurances? ?

September 252009

I am starting a new job March 1st. My benefits don’t kick in until May 1st. My current insurance from my empolyer I believe will end a month after my leaving (I think…must confirm) so I will be insurancless in April. I don’t want to ruin my financial security if I break my leg or get into a bad accident that month. What is my best bet? Will my current insurance extend coverage for a fee? Will my other one start early for a fee of would I be better off looking to an independent insurer? I don’t need pharmacy or regular dr visit help…but enough coverage to cover something major should it happen.

Thanks!

Find out if your current employer offers COBRA. Chances are they do. They will notify your carrier when you are terminated. They have 30 days to do this. The carrier then has 14 days to get the COBRA enrollment paperwork to you. You then have 60 days to decide if you want the coverage. The coverage will go retroactive back to your termination date. If something happens during that time frame and you need the coverage, you send in the acceptace along with the check for the premium payment. (This will be 100% of the premium-your employer will not be paying their part of it that they paid when you were their employee. It could be expensive!) If nothing happens during that time frame, decline the COBRA and you won’t have any out of pocket costs.